AI would have ruined me at 19.
Not because it's bad technology. Because I was a bad entrepreneur-in-training.
AI accelerates you toward wherever you're already going. At 19, I was going nowhere original. AI would have made me extraordinarily efficient at building generic startups that nobody wanted.
Here's the paradox of entrepreneurial development: The constraints that feel limiting are actually formative. Remove them too early, and you optimize for the wrong things.
The Easy Mode Trap
What every 19-year-old founder wants:
- Tools that eliminate friction
- Resources that remove barriers
- Optionality that reduces risk
- Support that makes everything easier
What actually creates successful entrepreneurs:
- Friction that forces creative solutions
- Barriers that demand resourcefulness
- Constraints that force commitment
- Difficulty that builds resilience
The trap: Easy mode feels obviously better. But easy mode produces easy entrepreneurs who fold when things get hard.
My 2019 Constraint Stack
Academic constraint: Couldn't continue college AND start a company Financial constraint: No family money, couldn't afford to fail casually
Technical constraint: Couldn't code, needed to find technical co-founder Geographic constraint: Student visa meant limited work options Social constraint: Friends and family thought dropping out was crazy
Each constraint forced a decision:
- Academic → Full commitment to entrepreneurship
- Financial → Focus on revenue-generating ideas, not just cool projects
- Technical → Partnership skills, learning to work with people different from me
- Geographic → Immigration strategy, thinking about global business
- Social → Independent thinking, comfortable being contrarian
Without these constraints, I would have:
- Stayed in school (no commitment forcing function)
- Built side projects for fun (no revenue pressure)
- Hired freelancers (no partnership skills development)
- Stayed local (no global thinking)
- Followed conventional wisdom (no contrarian muscle building)
AI would have removed every single constraint. And with it, every forcing function for growth.
The AI Acceleration Matrix
AI's effect depends entirely on what you're already optimizing for:
Going Somewhere Original → AI = Rocket Fuel
Example: Contrarian insight about market inefficiency
- Without AI: Slow manual validation, basic MVP, gradual refinement
- With AI: Rapid prototyping, sophisticated analysis, faster iteration
- Result: Get to unique solution faster, maintain competitive advantage
Example: Novel approach to old problem
- Without AI: Limited by execution capabilities, slow testing of hypotheses
- With AI: Test multiple approaches simultaneously, rapid feedback loops
- Result: Find breakthrough solution others can't replicate
Going Somewhere Generic → AI = Generic Accelerator
Example: "Better version of existing product"
- Without AI: Slow development gives time to realize market is saturated
- With AI: Build quickly into competitive, undifferentiated market
- Result: Faster path to inevitable failure
Example: Following startup playbooks
- Without AI: Execution limitations force creative problem-solving
- With AI: Perfect execution of mediocre strategy
- Result: Efficiently built product nobody wants
Going Nowhere → AI = Sophisticated Aimlessness
Example: No clear problem or customer in mind
- Without AI: Forced to think deeply about what to build and why
- With AI: Can build anything, so builds everything poorly
- Result: Impressive technical demos with no business model
The insight: AI amplifies your direction. If you have no direction, AI just amplifies aimlessness very efficiently.
The Generic Founder Acceleration Problem
What would have happened if I had AI at 19:
Phase 1: Information Consumption (Months 1-3)
My 19-year-old information diet:
- Paul Graham essays (gospel truth)
- Y Combinator startup library (the playbook)
- TechCrunch and startup media (what success looks like)
- Twitter founder culture (what to aspire to)
With AI acceleration:
- Could have consumed 10x more content 10x faster
- AI would have synthesized "best practices" from thousands of sources
- Would have developed false expertise about startups without building anything
- Perfect theoretical knowledge with zero practical experience
The problem: All this information pointed toward conventional startup wisdom. AI would have made me the world's most knowledgeable conventional thinker.
Phase 2: Idea Generation (Months 4-6)
Without AI (what I had to do):
- Talk to real people about real problems they faced
- Limited by ability to research and validate quickly
- Forced to pick one idea and commit due to execution constraints
With AI (what would have happened):
- Generated hundreds of "validated" startup ideas
- Perfect market research and competitive analysis for each
- Built elaborate business plans and financial projections
- Never committed to any single direction due to unlimited optionality
The result: Analysis paralysis disguised as sophisticated strategic thinking.
Phase 3: Execution (Months 7-18)
Without AI (actual path):
- Found technical co-founder (Arashdeep) out of necessity
- Built simple MVP with limited features
- Forced to talk to customers because couldn't build everything they asked for
- Iterated based on real feedback, not assumptions
With AI (counterfactual path):
- Built sophisticated product alone using AI tools
- Added every feature that seemed like a good idea
- Optimized for technical elegance over customer value
- Iterated based on AI analysis of user behavior, not customer conversations
The outcome: Technically impressive product that solved imaginary problems.
The Constraint-Removal Cascade
How AI would have systematically removed every growth-forcing constraint:
Constraint 1: Limited Technical Ability
Original effect: Forced to find technical co-founder, learn partnership AI removal: Can build anything alone, no partnership required Lost development: Collaboration skills, shared accountability, different perspectives
Constraint 2: Limited Market Research Capability
Original effect: Forced to talk directly to potential customers AI removal: Perfect market analysis from existing data sources Lost development: Customer empathy, problem identification skills, contrarian insights
Constraint 3: Limited Financial Resources
Original effect: Forced to focus on revenue-generating ideas AI removal: Can build elaborate products cheaply with AI tools Lost development: Resource constraint creativity, business model discipline, customer willingness to pay
Constraint 4: Limited Time and Attention
Original effect: Forced to prioritize ruthlessly, focus on essential features AI removal: Can pursue multiple projects simultaneously Lost development: Focus discipline, prioritization judgment, completion ability
The cascade effect: Each constraint removal eliminated a forcing function for essential entrepreneur skill development.
The Compound Interest of Constraints
Why constraints create exponential rather than linear benefits:
Short-term Pain, Long-term Gain
Constraint experience:
- Months 1-6: Frustrating limitations, slow progress, difficult decisions
- Months 7-12: Developing workarounds, creative solutions, resourcefulness
- Years 2-3: Constraints become advantages, developed skills differentiate from competitors
- Years 4-10: Compound interest kicks in, constraint-developed skills create unassailable advantages
AI easy mode:
- Months 1-6: Rapid progress, impressive early results, feeling of sophistication
- Months 7-12: Competitive markets, no differentiation, commoditized solutions
- Years 2-3: Plateau at mediocre level, no unique capabilities developed
- Years 4-10: Stuck competing on execution efficiency rather than unique insight
The Resourcefulness Muscle
Real example from constraint experience:
The problem (2020): Needed customer analytics but couldn't afford enterprise software
Constraint-forced solution:
- Built custom analytics using free tools and manual processes
- Learned exactly what metrics mattered through hands-on analysis
- Developed intuition for what customer behavior patterns meant
- Created competitive advantage through deeper understanding than analytics software could provide
What AI would have enabled:
- Perfect analytics dashboard built in hours using AI tools
- Sophisticated analysis without understanding fundamentals
- Dependency on AI interpretation rather than personal insight
- Generic analytics approach identical to what competitors could build
The difference: Constraint-forced solution created unique competitive intelligence. AI solution would have created generic business intelligence.
The Principle Development Problem
At 19, I had consumption patterns but no developed principles:
Information Consumption vs. Principle Formation
Without principles (age 19):
- Consumed advice about what successful people did
- Tried to copy strategies that worked for others
- Made decisions based on what seemed most likely to succeed
- Optimized for appearing smart and following best practices
With developed principles (age 27):
- Filter advice through personal experience and values
- Develop original approaches based on unique insights
- Make decisions based on what creates long-term value
- Optimize for authentic differentiation and sustainable advantage
The gap: AI excels at information synthesis but terrible at principle development. At 19, I needed principle development, not information synthesis.
If you're finding this useful, I send essays like this 2-3x per week.
·No spam
How Constraints Force Principle Development
Example: The Revenue vs. Growth Principle
Constraint situation: Limited resources, can't afford to burn cash on growth Forced decision: Focus on profitable customers and sustainable unit economics Principle developed: Revenue quality matters more than revenue quantity Long-term advantage: Built sustainable business while competitors burned out on unsustainable growth
AI counterfactual: Would have optimized for whatever metric seemed most important based on startup literature (probably growth), without developing personal conviction about sustainability.
The Modern Entrepreneur's Dilemma
How to get constraint benefits in an AI world:
Artificial Constraint Creation
Since natural constraints are disappearing, successful entrepreneurs must create artificial ones:
Time constraints:
- Artificially short development cycles (ship in 2 weeks, not 2 months)
- Regular demo days with real customers
- Quarterly constraint reviews and constraint tightening
Resource constraints:
- Deliberately small budgets for major initiatives
- No-hire periods to force efficiency and creative solutions
- Bootstrap mentality even with available capital
Complexity constraints:
- Maximum feature limits (can only have 3 features in MVP)
- Technology stack limitations (use only 2 programming languages)
- Team size caps (solve problems with current team before hiring)
The Constraint Selection Framework
Not all constraints are valuable. Choose constraints that force the right kind of growth:
Good constraints:
- Force customer interaction and feedback
- Require resource creativity and efficiency
- Demand prioritization and focus decisions
- Build resilience and problem-solving capability
Bad constraints:
- Create artificial difficulty without learning benefit
- Limit growth potential unnecessarily
- Prevent access to valuable resources or relationships
- Force suboptimal solutions to non-essential problems
Strategic Constraint Examples
The 10-customer constraint: Must get 10 paying customers before building any new features. Forces customer development and validation before expansion.
The 1-person constraint: Founder must be able to do every job in the company for first 6 months. Forces understanding of all business functions.
The 90-day constraint: Every major initiative must show results in 90 days or be discontinued. Forces focus on high-impact activities.
The cash-flow-positive constraint: Must be profitable within 12 months. Forces business model discipline and customer value focus.
When to Remove Constraints
Constraints should be temporary forcing functions, not permanent limitations:
Graduation Criteria
Remove constraints when:
- Skill developed: Constraint has built the intended capability
- Principle internalized: Decision-making framework established independent of constraint
- Competitive advantage created: Unique capability developed that differentiates from competitors
- Next-level constraint needed: Ready for more sophisticated constraint to drive next phase of growth
Example: The Technical Constraint Graduation
Phase 1 (Months 1-12): Can't code, must find technical co-founder Skill developed: Partnership, collaboration, technical communication Principle internalized: Great products require both technical and business thinking
Phase 2 (Months 13-24): Basic coding ability, must choose between coding and strategy Skill developed: Technical judgment, architectural thinking, make-vs-buy decisions Principle internalized: Technical leaders should understand but not necessarily implement
Phase 3 (Years 3+): Strong technical team, constraint becomes delegation New constraint: Must justify any personal coding time vs strategic work Next-level development: CEO-level thinking, organizational design, strategic focus
The Constraint Paradox
The most valuable constraints often feel the most limiting:
High-Value Constraints
Financial constraints: Force business model creativity and customer focus Technical constraints: Force elegant solutions and partnership development
Time constraints: Force prioritization and rapid decision-making Market constraints: Force customer empathy and product-market fit focus
Low-Value Constraints
Bureaucratic constraints: Create process without purpose Arbitrary constraints: Limit potential without building capability Perfectionist constraints: Prevent shipping and customer feedback Comfort zone constraints: Avoid necessary risk and growth challenges
The test: Does this constraint force me to develop a valuable skill or insight that will compound over time?
Conclusion: Embracing Strategic Difficulty
The counterintuitive truth about entrepreneurial success:
Easy mode produces:
- Technically sophisticated solutions to non-problems
- Perfect execution of mediocre strategies
- Competitive advantages based on temporary tool access
- Entrepreneurs who break when things get difficult
Constraint mode produces:
- Simple solutions to important problems
- Creative execution of unique strategies
- Competitive advantages based on developed capabilities
- Entrepreneurs who thrive when things get difficult
The modern entrepreneur's challenge: In a world where AI removes natural constraints, you must choose your constraints strategically.
Choose constraints that:
- Force customer interaction and real-world feedback
- Require creative problem-solving and resourcefulness
- Build resilience and independent thinking capability
- Create competitive advantages that compound over time