A Framework for Post-AI Business
The Post-AI Manifesto
What survives when AI eats everything
George Pu
December 2025 · 25 min read
Why I Wrote This
In January 2025, I watched Claude write production code faster than my best engineers. Not toy demos - real, working software.
I spent the next six months obsessing over one question: What does this mean for the companies I build and invest in?
This manifesto is what I found. It's not academic theory - it's a practical framework for building businesses that survive AI.
I'm sharing it because the founders who figure this out first will win. And I want those founders to be the ones who care about building real things, not just riding hype cycles.
This is for you if:
- ✓Founders building businesses meant to last 10+ years
- ✓Operators who sense disruption coming but can't pinpoint how
- ✓Investors evaluating what defensibility means now
- ✓Anyone who feels the ground shifting beneath them
This is not for you if:
- ✗People looking for a quick AI pivot playbook
- ✗Those convinced AI won't affect their industry
- ✗Anyone wanting confirmation that everything will be fine
How to use this manifesto:
- 1Read Part 1 first - it sets the frame
- 2Jump to Parts 6-10 for the practical framework
- 3Use the assessment tool to score your own business
- 4Come back to this as AI capabilities evolve
Want the PDF version?
Get a beautifully formatted PDF of the complete manifesto delivered to your inbox.
The World Changed
In December 2024, AI wrote better code than most developers. In January 2025, it started writing better copy than most marketers. In February, it began handling customer support better than most agents.
This isn't gradual improvement. It's displacement.
I've spent eighteen months watching businesses I invested in scramble to understand what AI means for them. Some adapted. Many didn't. The difference wasn't intelligence or resources - it was understanding which parts of their business AI would eat first.
Most founders are still asking the wrong question. They ask: 'How do I use AI in my business?'
The right question is: 'What parts of my business exist only because AI didn't?'
Every business model optimized for pre-AI scarcity is now built on sand.
The Three Lies We Tell Ourselves
Lie #1: 'AI can't do what we do'
This is the most dangerous lie. It's what Kodak said about digital photography. What taxis said about ride-sharing. What bookstores said about e-commerce.
The pattern is always the same: incumbents point to current limitations as proof of permanent protection. But AI doesn't need to be perfect to displace you - it just needs to be good enough at 1/10th the cost.
Lie #2: 'We'll just add AI to what we already do'
This is the 'strategy' of most companies: sprinkle AI on top and call it innovation. But bolting AI onto a business model built for pre-AI scarcity is like adding a GPS to a horse-drawn carriage.
The companies that win don't add AI - they rebuild around what AI makes possible while protecting what AI cannot replicate.
Lie #3: 'Our relationships will protect us'
Relationships do matter - Part 5 of this manifesto is dedicated to them. But 'relationships' based on convenience, habit, or lack of alternatives will evaporate the moment AI offers a better option.
Real relationship protection comes from irreplaceable human bonds - trust built through shared struggle, reputation earned over years, community that can't be manufactured. Not from 'we've worked together for three years.'
What AI Actually Eats
AI doesn't eat jobs uniformly. It eats specific types of value creation. Understanding this pattern is essential.
AI Eats: Information Arbitrage
Any business that profits primarily from knowing something others don't is facing disruption. Research services, market analysis, competitive intelligence - if the value is 'we know things you don't,' AI is coming for it.
AI Eats: Process Execution
Anything that can be documented, systematized, and repeated is now AI territory. This includes most professional services, administrative functions, and 'best practices' implementations.
AI Eats: Quality at Scale
The economics of 'good enough at scale' have collapsed. AI can produce B+ work infinitely. Any business model based on producing reliable-but-unremarkable output at scale is vulnerable.
AI Eats: Gatekeeping
Middlemen who add friction without adding irreplaceable value are first against the wall. Recruiters who just match keywords. Agencies that coordinate but don't create. Consultants who repackage frameworks.
If your business model has the word 'access' in it - access to information, access to talent, access to markets - you're in the blast radius.
What AI Cannot Eat
This is where the opportunity lives. AI has fundamental limitations that create permanent defensibility - if you know where to look.
Cannot Eat: Physical Reality
AI can design a house but can't build it. Can diagnose plumbing but can't fix it. Can optimize logistics but can't drive the truck (yet). Anything requiring atoms moved in the real world has inherent AI resistance.
Cannot Eat: Trust Relationships
Deep trust is built through shared experience, demonstrated reliability over time, and human judgment in high-stakes situations. Your doctor, your lawyer, your financial advisor - these relationships survive because you're trusting a person with your wellbeing, not just seeking information.
Cannot Eat: Network Effects (Real Ones)
True network effects - where value increases with each participant and switching costs compound - remain defensive. Not 'we have a database of users' but 'our users have built their professional identities here.'
Cannot Eat: Regulatory Capture
Licensed professions, compliance requirements, and regulatory moats don't disappear because AI is capable. A doctor still needs to sign off. A lawyer still needs to appear in court. An accountant still needs to certify.
Cannot Eat: Taste and Curation
AI can generate infinite options. It cannot tell you which one to choose. Human taste - knowing what's actually good, what will resonate, what matters - becomes more valuable as generation costs collapse.
Cannot Eat: Consequences
AI cannot be held liable. Cannot go to jail. Cannot be sued. Cannot be publicly shamed. When decisions require accountability that only humans can bear, humans remain essential.
The Five Safe Layers
After analyzing hundreds of businesses for AI vulnerability, I've identified five 'layers' that provide genuine protection. The more layers your business has, the more defensible it is.
Think of these layers as a shield. Any single layer can be penetrated. But each additional layer exponentially increases your defensibility.
Layer 1: Identity Investment
When customers make your product part of who they are - not just what they use - AI can't displace you. Apple users don't just use phones; they're 'Apple people.' CrossFit isn't just a gym; it's a tribe.
Questions to ask: Do customers publicly identify with your brand? Would switching feel like abandoning part of themselves? Is being your customer a statement about who they are?
Layer 2: Relationship Depth
Not all relationships are equally protective. The relationship that protects is one where: the customer would feel personal betrayal if you let them down; you know things about them no AI could learn from data; your history together creates irreplaceable context.
Questions to ask: Would customers take your call at 10 PM? Do they ask your advice on things outside your service scope? Have you celebrated or grieved with them?
Layer 3: Irreversible Stakes
When mistakes can't be undone, humans stay in the loop. Surgery, legal defense, major financial decisions, hiring - anywhere the downside is permanent, humans remain essential.
Questions to ask: Are mistakes in your domain easily reversible? Would customers trust AI alone with this decision? Is 'oops, let's try again' an acceptable response to failure?
Layer 4: Selection Judgment
AI can generate everything. Humans must choose. The skill of knowing what's good - real editorial judgment, taste, curation - becomes more valuable as generation costs hit zero.
Questions to ask: Is your value in creating options or choosing between them? Do customers pay for your judgment about what's good? Could an algorithm have selected what you selected?
Layer 5: Accountability Requirement
Someone must sign. Someone must testify. Someone must be responsible when things go wrong. This legal and social reality creates permanent human roles.
Questions to ask: Who goes to jail if this goes wrong? Whose name is on the line? Could responsibility for this outcome be delegated to software?
The Vulnerability Assessment
Here's a practical framework to assess your own business. Score each dimension honestly.
Revenue Source Analysis
Look at your revenue line by line. For each source, ask:
- Is this revenue tied to a specific human or relationship?
- Could AI replicate the value we provide here?
- What percentage of this revenue is 'commodity work'?
- If AI were 10x better tomorrow, would customers still pay for this?
The Replacement Test
For each major service or product you offer, complete this sentence: 'Customers pay us because AI cannot...'
If your honest answer is 'AI cannot... yet,' you're in trouble. If your answer is 'AI cannot... because physical presence/deep trust/legal accountability/genuine taste is required,' you're safer.
The Compression Test
Imagine AI reduces the time required for your service by 90%. What happens?
- If customers pay less: You're selling time, not value
- If customers pay the same: You're selling outcomes
- If customers pay more: You're selling status/trust/irreplaceability
The Rebuilding Framework
If your assessment reveals vulnerability, here's how to rebuild. This isn't about adding AI - it's about repositioning around what AI cannot touch.
Step 1: Separate Commodity from Core
Make a brutal list of everything you do. Divide into: what AI can do (commodity), what AI can assist (hybrid), what AI cannot do (core). Your future revenue should come only from core. Commodify or automate everything else.
Step 2: Price on Outcome, Not Effort
If you charge by the hour, you're competing with AI on efficiency - a losing battle. Restructure pricing around outcomes, not inputs. What result does the customer actually pay for?
Step 3: Build Irreversibility Into Your Offering
Create stakes. Make your work matter in ways that can't be undone. Sign your name. Accept liability. Be the one who goes to court if it fails. This isn't comfortable, but it's defensible.
Step 4: Invest in Real Relationships
Not 'customer success touches' or 'relationship marketing.' Real relationships: know their kids' names, remember their struggles, show up when they're hurting. This doesn't scale - that's the point.
Step 5: Become the Curator
Position yourself not as the creator but as the selector. The editor. The one who knows what's actually good. Your taste is your moat.
The Compounding Test
Here's a thought experiment that clarifies everything: Imagine AI improves at 3x per year for the next decade. What survives?
Year 1: AI handles routine tasks
If your business is mostly routine, you feel this immediately. Administrative functions, basic research, first-draft writing - all compressed.
Year 3: AI handles complex cognitive work
Analysis, strategy recommendations, creative production at scale. 'Knowledge work' becomes 'knowledge verification.'
Year 5: AI handles judgment calls
Most decisions that once required human judgment can be delegated. What remains: decisions where being wrong is catastrophic and irreversible.
Year 10: AI handles everything that doesn't require a body or a soul
Physical presence and genuine human connection become the only defensible advantages.
Run your business through this timeline. What's left at Year 10? That's what you should be building toward now.
The Uncomfortable Questions
Every founder should sit with these questions. They hurt. They should.
On Value:
- If AI could do everything I do, what would I do instead?
- What do customers pay for that they don't actually need anymore?
- Am I solving a real problem or exploiting information asymmetry?
On Relationships:
- How many of my customer relationships are real vs. transactional?
- If a competitor offered 50% lower prices, how many customers would stay?
- Do customers want to work with me, or do they just want the outcome?
On Identity:
- Is my work part of my customers' identity, or just a tool?
- Would my customers defend my business in public? Why?
- What would customers lose beyond the service if I disappeared?
On Stakes:
- What's the worst thing that happens if I make a mistake?
- Who is personally liable for my work product?
- Would customers trust AI alone with this decision?
Industries in the Crosshairs
Some industries are more vulnerable than others. Here's my assessment of the current landscape:
High Vulnerability
| Industry | Why | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Content Marketing | AI generates comparable quality infinitely | Already happening |
| Translation | AI has reached professional quality | 1-2 years |
| Basic Legal Services | Document review, contracts, filings | 2-3 years |
| Tax Preparation | Routine returns fully automatable | Already happening |
| Market Research | Data gathering and synthesis | Already happening |
Medium Vulnerability
| Industry | Why | What Survives |
|---|---|---|
| Consulting | Analysis commoditized | Senior partner judgment, relationships |
| Creative Agencies | Production commoditized | Strategy, taste, client relationships |
| Software Development | Code generation improving rapidly | Architecture, client needs translation |
| Healthcare Admin | Documentation and scheduling automated | Patient relationship, clinical judgment |
Lower Vulnerability
| Industry | Why Protected |
|---|---|
| Surgery / Physical Medicine | Physical presence required |
| High-Stakes Legal | Courtroom presence, liability |
| Wealth Management (High-Net-Worth) | Deep trust relationships |
| Luxury Services | Status and exclusivity are inherently human |
| Skilled Trades | Physical reality manipulation |
What To Do Monday Morning
Theory is worthless without action. Here's what to do this week:
Day 1: Revenue Audit
Print out your revenue sources. For each one, write whether the value comes from: information, process, relationships, judgment, or physical presence. Circle anything that's primarily information or process.
Day 2: Customer Conversations
Call three of your best customers. Ask: 'If AI could do everything we do at a fraction of the cost, would you still work with us? Why or why not?' Listen to what they actually value.
Day 3: Competitive Analysis
Google your service + 'AI.' See what exists. Try it. How close is it to what you offer? What's the gap? Is that gap shrinking?
Day 4: Team Discussion
Share this manifesto with your leadership team. Have an honest conversation about which parts of your business are vulnerable. Make it safe to be brutally honest.
Day 5: Action Plan
Based on the week's learning, identify one thing you're going to stop doing (commodity work), one thing you're going to do more of (core work), and one investment you're going to make in relationships or irreversibility.
The Builder's Choice
This manifesto isn't pessimistic. It's realistic. And realism creates opportunity.
The founders who understand these shifts first will build the companies of the next era. Not by fighting AI, but by building around what makes us irreplaceable.
We are at an inflection point. The businesses built for the pre-AI world will struggle. The businesses built for the post-AI world will thrive.
The choice is simple: adapt or decline.
Build for relationships, not transactions. Build for judgment, not process. Build for accountability, not convenience. Build for the long game, not the quick win.
AI is the most powerful tool humanity has ever created. Use it to eliminate the parts of your business that shouldn't exist. Double down on the parts that only you can do.
The future belongs to the builders who get this right.
The best time to plant a tree was twenty years ago. The second best time is now. The worst time is after the forest fire has already started.
The fire is here.
Start building.