Looked at 100 SaaS tools I used in 2022.
Can replace 87 of them with AI + 30 minutes.
The SaaS bloodbath is coming.
Tool Audit Methodology
How I did this analysis:
Step 1: Complete SaaS Inventory Exported all subscriptions from credit cards and bank statements for 2022. Found 127 SaaS tools across personal and business accounts.
Step 2: Usage Classification
- Active: Used weekly or more
- Occasional: Used monthly
- Zombie: Paying but not using
- Essential: Business-critical
Result: 100 active + occasional tools. 27 zombie subscriptions canceled immediately.
Step 3: AI Replacement Test For each tool, I asked: "Can I achieve the same outcome using Claude, ChatGPT, or other AI tools with ≤30 minutes of setup?"
Step 4: Replacement Implementation Actually replaced the tools for 30 days to validate the hypothesis. Not theoretical—real usage.
The shocking result: 87 out of 100 tools were replaceable with minimal effort.
The Replacement Categories
Category 1: Writing and Content (23 tools → 1 AI tool)
Tools I used to pay for:
- Grammarly ($144/year) → Claude proofreads better
- Jasper AI ($588/year) → ChatGPT writes better content
- Copy.ai ($228/year) → Claude handles all copywriting
- Hemingway Editor ($240/year) → Claude analyzes readability
- CoSchedule Headline Analyzer ($180/year) → Claude generates better headlines
- Buffer ($144/year) → Claude writes and schedules posts
- Later ($300/year) → Claude plans content calendars
- Canva Pro ($120/year) → Claude + simple tools create better graphics
Total annual cost: $1,944 AI replacement cost: $240/year (Claude Pro + ChatGPT Plus) Savings: $1,704/year (87% reduction)
Quality comparison: AI output is consistently better. More personalized, faster iteration, better understanding of brand voice.
Category 2: Research and Analysis (19 tools → AI + basic tools)
Replaced tools:
- SEMrush ($1,200/year) → Perplexity + Claude analysis
- Ahrefs ($1,188/year) → AI competitive research
- SimilarWeb ($2,400/year) → Claude market analysis
- BuzzSumo ($948/year) → AI content trend analysis
- Typeform ($468/year) → Claude survey design + Google Forms
- SurveyMonkey ($384/year) → Same replacement
- Hotjar ($390/year) → Claude user behavior analysis from support tickets
- Google Analytics ($0) → Still use, but Claude analyzes the data better
Total annual cost: $6,978 AI replacement cost: $240/year Savings: $6,738/year (97% reduction)
The insight: Most research tools just aggregate and present data. AI does the aggregation better and provides deeper analysis.
Category 3: Customer Support and Communication (18 tools → AI workflows)
Replaced tools:
- Intercom ($3,600/year) → Claude-powered chatbot + email
- Zendesk ($1,800/year) → Claude drafts responses, human approves
- Calendly ($96/year) → Claude + Google Calendar integration
- Acuity Scheduling ($168/year) → Same replacement
- Loom ($96/year) → Claude scripts + simple screen recording
- Drift ($2,400/year) → Claude conversation flows
- HelpScout ($1,200/year) → Claude knowledge base + email
- Freshdesk ($900/year) → Claude support automation
Total annual cost: $10,260 AI replacement cost: $240/year + human time Savings: $10,020/year (98% reduction)
Quality impact: Customer satisfaction actually improved. AI responses are more consistent, available 24/7, and don't have bad days.
Category 4: Marketing and Sales (15 tools → AI + simple platforms)
Replaced tools:
- HubSpot Marketing ($3,600/year) → Claude + basic CRM
- Mailchimp ($348/year) → Claude + ConvertKit
- ActiveCampaign ($1,740/year) → Claude automation + simple email tool
- Leadpages ($588/year) → Claude + basic website builder
- OptinMonster ($228/year) → Claude + simple popup tools
- Mixpanel ($240/year) → Claude analysis of basic analytics
- Segment ($1,200/year) → Claude + direct integrations
Total annual cost: $7,944 AI replacement cost: $500/year (AI + basic tools) Savings: $7,444/year (94% reduction)
The pattern: Marketing tools mostly add complexity to simple tasks. AI cuts through the complexity.
Category 5: Project Management and Productivity (12 tools → AI + basic systems)
Replaced tools:
- Asana ($1,200/year) → Claude + simple task tracking
- Monday.com ($1,140/year) → Claude project planning + spreadsheets
- Slack ($1,080/year) → Email + Claude meeting summaries
- Notion ($120/year) → Claude + basic note-taking
- Airtable ($240/year) → Claude + Google Sheets
- Zapier ($588/year) → Claude + Make (much cheaper)
- IFTTT ($36/year) → Claude automation logic
Total annual cost: $4,404 AI replacement cost: $300/year Savings: $4,104/year (93% reduction)
Productivity impact: Actually got more productive. Less time managing tools, more time creating value.
What Survives the AI Wave
The 13 tools I couldn't replace:
1. Core Infrastructure (4 tools)
- Stripe (payments) → AI can't process credit cards
- AWS (hosting) → AI needs servers to run on
- Cloudflare (CDN) → Physics still matters for global distribution
- GitHub (code repository) → AI generates code but needs version control
2. Legal and Compliance (3 tools)
- DocuSign → Legal signatures require human verification
- QuickBooks → Tax compliance needs human oversight
- G Suite → Email infrastructure with compliance features
3. Deep Technical Tools (3 tools)
- Cursor → AI coding assistant (AI helping AI)
- Linear → Issue tracking with developer workflow integration
- PostHog → Product analytics with real-time data processing
4. Physical World Interfaces (3 tools)
- Shopify → E-commerce with payment processing and fulfillment
- Cal.com → Calendar coordination with multiple humans
- Zoom → Real-time video communication
The pattern: Survive if you handle money, legal compliance, real-time coordination, or deep technical workflows.
The SaaS Bloodbath Timeline
2024: Early Disruption (Already Happening)
Obvious targets getting hit first:
- Content writing tools (Jasper, Copy.ai, Writesonic)
- Basic research tools (keyword research, competitor analysis)
- Simple automation tools (basic Zapier workflows)
- Template-based design tools (Canva competitors)
Evidence: Revenue decline reports, layoffs, pivots to "AI-enhanced" offerings.
2025: Mass Market Disruption
Mid-tier SaaS getting replaced:
- Customer support platforms (Intercom, Zendesk)
- Marketing automation (HubSpot, Mailchimp)
- Project management (Asana, Monday.com)
- Survey and form tools (Typeform, SurveyMonkey)
Signs to watch: Massive price cuts, desperate feature additions, acquisition rumors.
2026: Enterprise Disruption
Even complex tools becoming vulnerable:
- CRM systems (Salesforce features)
- Analytics platforms (Google Analytics replacements)
- HR and recruiting tools (applicant tracking, onboarding)
- Financial planning and analysis tools
The prediction: 90% of SaaS companies will be dead, acquired for pennies, or dramatically shrunk by end of 2026.
How to SaaS-Proof Your Business
If you're building SaaS, here's how to survive:
Strategy 1: Go Deeper Into Compliance and Regulation
Build tools that require human oversight, legal compliance, or regulatory approval.
Examples:
- Financial services with banking regulations
- Healthcare with HIPAA compliance
- Government contracts with security clearances
- Legal tech with attorney oversight requirements
Why it works: AI can help but can't replace human accountability for regulated decisions.
Strategy 2: Focus on Real-Time Coordination
Build tools that coordinate multiple humans in real-time with high stakes.
Examples:
- Emergency response coordination
- Live event management
- Supply chain crisis management
- Real-time financial trading platforms
Why it works: Human judgment still required for high-stakes, time-sensitive coordination.
Strategy 3: Integrate with Physical World
Build software that controls or monitors physical assets.
Examples:
- Manufacturing equipment control
- IoT device management
- Logistics and fulfillment
- Physical security systems
Why it works: AI can optimize but physical world requires human oversight.
Strategy 4: Become an AI Platform
Build tools that help others use AI more effectively.
Examples:
- AI model training platforms
- AI workflow orchestration
- AI output quality control
- AI integration management
Why it works: If you can't beat AI, help others use AI better.
Strategy 5: Human-AI Hybrid Models
Build tools where AI does 80% of work but humans handle edge cases.
Examples:
- Legal document review (AI analysis + lawyer approval)
- Medical diagnosis assistance (AI suggestions + doctor decisions)
- Investment research (AI analysis + human judgment)
- Content moderation (AI filtering + human review)
Why it works: Combines AI efficiency with human accountability.
Opportunities in the Disruption
Where to invest or build during the SaaS collapse:
Opportunity 1: AI Integration Services
Help traditional companies replace their SaaS stack with AI workflows.
Market size: Every company using 50+ SaaS tools needs this transition. Revenue model: Implementation services + ongoing optimization Timeline: High demand starting 2024
Opportunity 2: AI-Resistant SaaS Consolidation
Acquire struggling SaaS companies at low valuations, integrate AI to reduce costs.
Want the full playbook? I wrote a free 350+ page book on building without VC.
Read the free book·Online, free
Strategy: Buy for 10-20% of previous valuation, cut 80% of costs with AI Target companies: Mid-market SaaS with good customer base but high operational costs Exit: Higher margins, same revenue, much more profitable
Opportunity 3: Human-in-the-Loop Platforms
Build platforms that orchestrate AI + human workflows for compliance-heavy industries.
Examples:
- AI + lawyer for contract review
- AI + accountant for tax preparation
- AI + doctor for medical analysis
- AI + engineer for safety-critical systems
Opportunity 4: Anti-AI Positioning
Target customers who specifically want human-only services.
Market segments:
- High-net-worth individuals who value human attention
- Regulated industries with AI restrictions
- Companies with AI skepticism or bad AI experiences
- Premium brands that want human craftsmanship
Opportunity 5: AI Infrastructure Tools
Build picks and shovels for the AI economy.
Examples:
- AI model monitoring and management
- AI workflow orchestration platforms
- AI output quality assurance tools
- AI cost optimization services
My Personal SaaS Purge Results
Financial impact of replacing 87 tools:
Before (2022 annual SaaS costs): $31,526 After (2024 AI + basic tools): $3,240 Annual savings: $28,286 Cost reduction: 90%
Quality impact:
Better outcomes: 67 of 87 tools (77%)
- Writing, research, analysis, customer support significantly improved
Same outcomes: 15 of 87 tools (17%)
- Project management, basic automation roughly equivalent
Worse outcomes: 5 of 87 tools (6%)
- Some design tools and complex integrations temporarily disrupted
Time impact:
- Setup time: ~40 hours over 6 months
- Daily efficiency: +2 hours/day (less tool switching, AI handles mundane tasks)
- ROI on time investment: ~300%
The bottom line: Massive cost savings, better quality, higher productivity.
Industry-Specific Predictions
Marketing SaaS: 95% extinction rate
Most marketing tools are just data aggregation + basic analysis. AI does both better.
Survivors: Tools with unique data sources or real-time advertising integration.
Customer Support SaaS: 80% extinction rate
AI chatbots are already better than most human support. Integration with business systems is the only moat.
Survivors: Tools with deep CRM integration or industry-specific compliance requirements.
Analytics SaaS: 85% extinction rate
AI can analyze any dataset better than pre-built dashboard tools.
Survivors: Real-time data processing platforms and industry-specific regulatory reporting.
Content Creation SaaS: 98% extinction rate
General AI tools dominate all content creation categories.
Survivors: Tools with proprietary data sources or industry-specific templates.
Project Management SaaS: 70% extinction rate
AI can handle most coordination and planning tasks.
Survivors: Tools that integrate deeply with development workflows or compliance processes.
The Contrarian Take
What everyone believes: "AI will enhance SaaS tools, not replace them."
What I believe: "AI will completely eliminate the need for most SaaS categories."
The evidence:
Enhancement approach (what most SaaS companies are doing):
- Add AI features to existing tools
- Charge premium for "AI-enhanced" versions
- Maintain existing complex workflows with AI assistance
Replacement approach (what actually works):
- Skip the SaaS tool entirely
- Use general AI for specific outcomes
- Simpler workflows with better results
Why enhancement fails: Adding AI to bloated software doesn't solve the fundamental problem that the software is unnecessary.
Why replacement works: AI eliminates the underlying need for category-specific tools.
What This Means for Different People
If you work at a SaaS company:
Start learning AI skills now. Your job may not exist in 2 years. Consider transitioning to:
- AI implementation services
- Human-AI hybrid roles
- Industries AI can't automate (regulated, physical, high-touch)
If you're building a SaaS company:
Stop building features that AI can replicate. Focus on:
- Regulatory compliance requirements
- Real-time human coordination
- Physical world integration
- Deep technical workflows
If you're using lots of SaaS tools:
Audit your stack quarterly. Every tool you're paying for might have an AI replacement.
If you're an investor:
Be very careful about SaaS investments. Ask specific questions about AI replacement risk.
For customers:
Don't fall for "AI-enhanced" marketing. Often you can skip the tool entirely and use AI directly.
Action Steps
This week:
- List all SaaS tools you're paying for
- Pick the 3 most expensive and test AI replacements
- Calculate potential annual savings from AI substitution
This month:
- Implement AI replacements for 5-10 obvious tools
- Document workflows that work better with AI
- Cancel subscriptions for successfully replaced tools
This quarter:
- Complete full SaaS stack audit and replacement plan
- Train team on AI workflows for replaced tools
- Reinvest savings into AI infrastructure or team development
This year:
- Achieve 70%+ reduction in SaaS costs through AI replacement
- Build competitive advantage through AI-first workflows
- Position business as AI-enhanced rather than SaaS-dependent